Kamala Harris, who launched her campaign for president, has long been a favorite of Hollywood donors.

Kamala Harris has launched her campaign for the White House, after President Joe Biden stepped aside Sunday under pressure from party leaders.

The vice president has Biden’s endorsement, and is unchallenged as yet for the Democratic nomination, which will be formally decided at the Aug. 19 convention in Chicago.

“I am honored to have the President’s endorsement and my intention is to earn and win this nomination,” Harris said in a statement. “I will do everything in my power to unite the Democratic Party—and unite our nation—to defeat Donald Trump and his extreme Project 2025 agenda. We have 107 days until Election Day. Together, we will fight. And together, we will win.”

In her statement, the vice president paid tribute to Biden’s “extraordinary leadership,” saying he had achieved more in one term than many presidents do in two.

    • LustyArgonian@lemmy.worldEnglish
      694·
      4 个月前

      The only way you’ll get a candidate that aligns with 100% of your personal beliefs, is if you run for office yourself

      That being said, I’d love a real leftwing candidate

      • ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world
        11·
        4 个月前

        And sometimes you have to run on or embrace the ideals of someone else just to get elected. Unfortunate.

      • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        1745·
        4 个月前

        Both candidates are right wing so it’s not really “BOtH sIdEs.” People on the left would like some representation for once.

        • PunnyName@lemmy.world
          135·
          4 个月前

          What policies have the right and left regularly agreed upon? What bills put forth have unanimous votes?

          • Steve@communick.newsEnglish
            114·
            4 个月前

            I think your conflating Right and Left with Republican and Democrat.
            They aren’t the same thing.

            Both parties have been pro-corporate oligopoly. The Republicans, just more so.
            Both parties have been catering to the same class of big corporate donors. The Republicans, just more so.
            Both parties have been pro-military-industrial-complex. The Republicans, just more so.
            Both parties have been pro-Israli genocide. The Republicans, just more so.
            Both parties have shown a little movement toward economic populism. The Democrats, just more so.

            They might not vote together on many bills. Because it would look bad to their respective bases if they did.
            But they’ve both been pushing in similar directions on a number of topics for decades.

            • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
              1221·
              4 个月前

              Fighting universal healthcare. Refusing to revoke Citizens United. Refusing the Right to Repair.

              The Patriot Act. The Iraq War. Enabling The Genocide of Palestine. The continuous decline into corporatocracy.

              All bipartisan efforts.

              You shitlibs genuinely do not understand the conversation happening in front of you. We know you don’t, or you wouldn’t be a shitlib, you’d be a social democrat at worst.

              • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                158·
                4 个月前

                Using the term sHiTliB renders you exempt from discourse. It’s like screaming that you’re unreachable and a huge waste of time

                • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
                  78·
                  4 个月前

                  What an embarrassing response after your own “BOtH SiDEs” and “yeah they’ll totally respond with facts” comments. You can’t even address the numerous examples they listed?

                  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                    97·
                    4 个月前

                    I don’t argue with people who tell me it’s hopeless to. I will say though, you’re living up to the tag I gave you in the past.

                  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.worldEnglish
                    43·
                    4 个月前

                    Why carry on a meaningful conversation when you can latch onto a single word and use it as an excuse to dismiss everything else someone says?

                    It’s way easier than having defensible positions.

    • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
      3610·
      4 个月前

      Yes, that’s what rational people do, pick the less damaging choice.

      What the FUCK is wrong with you people who actively choose the more damaging choice for lulz?