Rep. Joseph Morelle of New York, the top Democrat on the House Administration Committee, sent a letter to colleagues informing them of his intent to file the resolution, which would kickstart what’s traditionally a cumbersome amendment process.

“This amendment will do what SCOTUS failed to do — prioritize our democracy,” Morelle said in a statement to AP.

        • APassenger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          He’s too virtuous. He hasn’t processed that anything he does is legal.

          So he leads be example. Or something.

          Maybe someone should explain it to him before 4 PM?

          • paddirn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            29
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            It feels so Game of Thrones-ish. Democrats are going to act all high and mighty and virtuous, while Republicans are just going to be like Cersei Lannister, “Is this meant to be your shield, Lord Stark? A piece of paper?” Republicans will run them through and sleep well knowing they won, without a guilty conscience. The President should be acting now to protect the country, not waiting for the wolves to get into the hen house and then wringing their hands that there was nothing they could do about it.

            • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              6 months ago

              That’s pretty much it. Republicans are bring out the spiked maces and Dems are just trying to fisticuff they’re way out of it. Because virtue.

              • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                6 months ago

                Not even fisticuffs. They’re filing a motion to discourage mace spikes over a certain length.

                Pending the approval of some unelected clerk rando with only symbolic authority, of course.

      • FiniteBanjo
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Being free from the consequences of your actions does not give you absolute power and authority. He can’t fire them, because he never had that power. What he can do is have them swatted and kill them in official capacity, although he can still be impeached.

        • APassenger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Trump signed an executive order and made much of the executive branch fire-able. Go far enough and that influence can turn into control over other parts of the government.

          There’s a path to effective termination.

          • linearchaos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Nah, that one only works because the executive branch belongs to the president. It’s kind of like my boss saying there’s a new rule at my work and he can fire you at will from your work.

            It would be a really convenient way to go if it worked though…

    • FiniteBanjo
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Them actively denying legislature on a whim would be time consuming and bring us closer to congress impeaching the justices and removing them.