• HKPiax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Can’t believe this comic is always on point. It feels so modern with the situations it shows each time, and yet it’s 100+ years old.

        • dalekcaan@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          So you’re punching and you’re kicking and you’re shouting at me

          I’m relying on your common decency

          So far it hasn’t surfaced but I’m sure it exists

          It just takes a while to travel from your head to your fist

          (Gonna have that stuck in my head for a while now)

      • kaitco@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        6 months ago

        Some of them hold up, some of them not so much.

        As does any work over time.

        There’s, however, a difference in a depiction that was common at the time, versus outright racism. I mean, people still read about and rave over Lovecraft’s work and he was so racist that the other racists of his time used to tell him to chill.

        You take the good with the bad in things from another time. Enjoy what you can in the good and learn from the bad.

        • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          people still read about and rave over Lovecraft’s work and he was so racist that the other racists of his time used to tell him to chill.

          I’ve heard he did actually chill in his later years

        • frigidaphelion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          I did not know this ☹️ I do recall some interesting name choices though so I guess I should have realized. There was a cat in a story (Rats in the walls I think) that had a slur for a name.

      • brsrklf@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        6 months ago

        Ouch, those are not good indeed.

        Also, the last page shines a new light on how bad Mr True’s “outbursts” really get, holy shit.

      • Venator@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Or maybe you’re just cherry picking the ones that don’t hold up 🤔😅

    • Kairos
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      It portrays black people in a very racist way.

      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        6 months ago

        That’s not unique to one writer. That’s almost all literature from the time period, unless it had a black author. You would have to read books by W.E.B. DuBois, or maybe Huckleberry Finn, for good portrayals of black people in literature.

  • Stern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Wild that there was a point in history you could get close enough to a zoo critter to hand feed (or harass) it. World really was a simpler place in those days.

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      6 months ago

      A zoo used to be little more than animals in cages put on display for public viewing. The idea is a modernization of the menageries that used to be kept by nobility, and the first public zoos were just these menageries opened to the public:

      Until the early 19th century, the function of the zoo was often to symbolize royal power, like King Louis XIV’s menagerie at Versailles. Major cities in Europe set up zoos in the 19th century, usually using London and Paris as models. The transition was made from princely menageries designed to entertain high society with strange novelties into public zoological gardens. (ref)

    • brsrklf@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Depends on the animal. I know a decent zoo that has just simple waist-high walls around the porcupines and raccoon dogs for example.

      They have space, but they can get pretty close. I guess a complete idiot with a cane could probably harass them, until someone stops them like “what the hell, asshole”. Or you know, until Everett True comes and causes permanent spine damage to them.

      Obviously animals like bears, apes and big felines can’t get that close to people.

    • Artyom@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      No, it’s fortunately no longer a thing at any zoo I’ve been to…probably only because the animals have larger cages and are behind solid glass instead of bars…

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        The big enclosures with moats are better for everyone. View is unobstructed by bars, animals can get some sunshine and swimming.