• conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Being the best product on the market is not what a problematic monopoly is.

      A monopoly uses anticompetitive means to suppress competition, then exploits that market share in anti consumer ways. Steam does neither. They’re just better.

      • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        A monopoly has the means to engage in anticompetitive practices. Whether or not they do is a separate thing. That’s why you clarified “a problematic monopoly.”

        • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          It does matter whether they do. It’s impossible for Epic to have a valid complaint (and the fact that they both throw a tantrum at every company who doesn’t just give them exactly what they want, and actually do behave anticompetitively by using their market position with UE to try to force people onto their fucking disgusting excuse for a store tell you they don’t) unless Steam is abusing their market position to make competition impossible.

          “We can’t be bothered competing” is not a valid legal argument.

          • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Having that market position is what defines a monopoly.

            Abusing it is a crime that only a monopoly can commit.

            Whether they do it or not is not what makes them a monopoly.