Sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 年前Sorry for the inconveniencesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square65linkfedilinkarrow-up1723arrow-down112
arrow-up1711arrow-down1imageSorry for the inconveniencesh.itjust.worksSjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 年前message-square65linkfedilink
minus-squareSlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·2 年前I googled for 50 mm. That should be close enough.
minus-squareFilthyShrooms@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 年前2.5 inches is 635 mm. Thats much closer to 50 cm
minus-squareSnipingNinja@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 年前That doesn’t sound right to me. An inch has ~2.54 cm, so 2.5" should be 6.35 cm and a cm has 10mm, so that becomes 63.5mm
minus-squareSlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 年前1 inch is 25,4 mm, not 254 mm.
minus-squareFilthyShrooms@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 年前I am often incorrect. Today is one of those days
I googled for 50 mm. That should be close enough.
Relevant username
2.5 inches is 635 mm. Thats much closer to 50 cm
That doesn’t sound right to me. An inch has ~2.54 cm, so 2.5" should be 6.35 cm and a cm has 10mm, so that becomes 63.5mm
1 inch is 25,4 mm, not 254 mm.
I am often incorrect. Today is one of those days
Lol, 2.5 inches is over 2 feet?