If inciting an insurrection towards their own government is an action without legal repercussions, I don’t see how the law would be less lenient about straight up firing a gun at an opponent.
I by no means want any party to resolve to violent tactics. So even though I play with the thought, I really don’t want anything like it to happen. I am just curious if it’s actually the case that a sitting president has now effectively a licence to kill.
What am I missing?
Trump could bring his own gun and shoot him and the Court would still call it official.
When you own the people that make the laws. You are above the law. So yes. Trump could 100% get away with it. One of the few things he’s said that wasn’t a lie.