• TurboHarbinger@feddit.cl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      You’re wasting taxpayers money in fiction and pseudoscience. Every law needs at least one real example of something being done in bad faith or at least proven possible (even if the perpetrator fails at it).

      The cameras was just a real example of invasion of privacy. By your logic maybe we need to make laws against time traveling ASAP, considering at any moment time travelers will be more relevant than ever.

      You need to start making laws for things that really affects your life right now, instead of fictional maybes.

        • TurboHarbinger@feddit.cl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Me: This new law is against fiction. Your example is for something that’s not fiction. Do you understand the difference?

          This is what I mean by your logic. Do you understand the difference between fiction and reality?

          I mean, you said that camera thing like it was some kind of mic drop lol

          Because surveillance never has been an issue /s. Did you just read the last comment and ignore the rest? One is a real problem, the other is fiction. Do you understand the difference?

          Personally I think the Justice system attempting to have a bit of foresight is a good thing

          Sure man, let’s make a law about something we know nothing about, what could go wrong.