• DogPeePoo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    141
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    With zero moderation and one candidate spewing nothing but lies, they can expect lower future viewership too.

    What was even the point, CNN?

    • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Apparently the only way the candidates will agree to do it is if the format is so stilted that there’s no chance of anyone learning anything or seeing the candidates get challenged on anything. It’s basically just a taking-in-turns version of a campaign commercial.

      What, indeed, is the point. Like a lot of American politics, the whole “debate” survives as a pointless vestige of a thing (now long forgotten) that was useful and productive in its original form, but now is mutated to a useless and unrecognizable monstrosity, which you have to pretend is super serious and important if you want to be able to be on TV.

    • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      To bring sexy back.

      (But seriously, what a terrible television program, one old man spouting nonsense and the other looking confused and lost. There was absolutely zero reason for anyone to watch it.)

      • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s a great program if you like watching people laugh at old people for being old. Basically what I’m saying is this program was elderly abuse.

    • FiniteBanjo
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      Not to mention, it’s basically the same debate we had four years ago.