• GiddyGap@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    If you compare the US with countries with very strict gun laws, e.g. Europe, you’ll probably find that the difference between their low gun violence rate and the high gun violence rate in the US is related to the easy access to weapons in the US.

    It’s also related to the general inequality in the US compared to Europe, especially economic. It created a lot of desperation in the US. But half the country is also not willing to do anything about that, because that’s “socialism” or whatever. And round and round we go.

    • MagicShel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Sure but that isn’t the point of my question, and treads perilously close to the area I’m trying to avoid. I’m not interested in the political decision here, but the facts that purport to underlie it.

      I can’t argue in favor of this action citing facts that not only seem to be bullshit, but also threaten to undermine the narrative that people don’t need guns for protection because violent crime is so low.

      Here we have the surgeon general saying gun violence is so bad it’s an emergency. How is that going to play with people who hoard guns out of xenophobic paranoia over their own safety?