Changes in version 1.5.0

Resources 1.5 has landed and brings with it monitoring for batteries along with the usual bug fixes and improvements. Enjoy!

🐛 Bug fixes

  • If the Processes view was the last opened view and the “Show search fields on launch” setting was enabled, the search bar was not automatically focused
  • Graphs in the sidebar were reset when a drive or network interface was added or removed
  • App icons were not shown for user-wide installed Flatpaks
  • The calculated amount of logical CPUs was wrong for systems with multiple CPU sockets

✨ New features

  • Resources can now monitor connected batteries
  • CPU usage normalization can now be toggled off
  • Total read and write stats for drives

📈 Improvements

  • Graph colors have been revamped to avoid low contrast situations and improve consistency within views
  • Some keyboard shortcuts were changed to avoid clashes with standard shortcuts
  • More stability when performance statistics could not be determined
  • Some entries in the settings dialog now have subtitles
  • If a drive has no model name, its block device name will now be shown in the titlebar
  • Small accessibility improvements
  • Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m currently using Mission Center, which is also really good. One of these should replace GNOME’s system monitor tho because it honestly kind of sucks.

    • dko1905@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah, I find it really nice to use but I experience a lag spike when I open Mission Center… so that’s a bit annoying.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I’d call gnome system monitor good enough but out of place from a layout perspective. Its looked the same for as long as I can remember

      I also personally don’t like the mission center layout as much. It feels like they copied Windows for no good reason. However, that’s just a personal preference

      • Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        They definitely copied Windows but Windows’ Task Manager is honestly one of the few things I actually like about Windows. My issues with Gnome System Monitor is that it’s missing important information, information isn’t easy to read, I don’t think there’s a way to stop an application and it doesn’t look good.