• Krono
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    If you actually agreed with their message, then I don’t think you would take the time to whinge about the safety of the precious rocks.

    • tristan@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      5 months ago

      No, because I don’t agree with their methods… Just like any extremist group might have a good message but doesn’t mean I agree with them bombing oil pipelines or kidnapping people

      Attacking rocks does nothing to progress their cause… Attacking things in the environment doesn’t even line up with their cause of wanting to protect the environment

      As long as they stick to actually attacking the companies and groups that actually are the cause of the problems, I would support their methods and as a result, them as a group

      • federalreverse-old@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        While I haven’t heard a reasoning from any of these groups why they perform provocative acts in galleries and on historical sites, I think there are reasons:

        1. A lot of art galleries, opera houses, and other institutions of high culture are supported by the super-rich. As such many of these institutions are outlets of fossil-fuel money.

        2. High culture is essentially a distraction for those with education and intellect. So going to places of high culture means you tend to reach (and, granted, annoy) the kinds of people who have enough free mental bandwidth to understand and enough clout to actually influence decisions.