Lemmy Today
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Bungkarnoenjoyer@lemmygrad.ml to Comradeship // Freechat@lemmygrad.ml · 2 years ago

Folks on Wikipedia discussing on the 'CPC/CCP Acronym' issue

en.wikipedia.org

external-link
message-square
15
link
fedilink
38
external-link

Folks on Wikipedia discussing on the 'CPC/CCP Acronym' issue

en.wikipedia.org

Bungkarnoenjoyer@lemmygrad.ml to Comradeship // Freechat@lemmygrad.ml · 2 years ago
message-square
15
link
fedilink
Talk:Chinese Communist Party - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
external-link
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • loathsome dongeater@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    I cannot follow this at all. Who among these users has the authority to decide whether Wikipedia should switch from CCP to CPC? Most of the people seem to agree that CPC is the official name so should be preferred but there oxygen is sucked by the argument about whether CCP is racist or not which shouldn’t have to factor in if CPC is deemed official.

    • GaryLeChat@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      2 years ago

      The editor out of Langley, Virginia has the final say lol.

    • relay@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Liberal feelings are much more important than facts.

      • redtea@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        1 down vote = 1 prayer liberal with hurt feelings

    • Shinhoshi@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Nobody, and switching would probably go against Wikipedia’s Manual of Style

      • loathsome dongeater@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        switching would probably go against Wikipedia’s Manual of Style (WP:VAR)

        Can you please expand on this?

        • Shinhoshi@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 years ago

          Here’s a summary:

          The Arbitration Committee has expressed the principle that “When either of two styles is acceptable it is inappropriate for a Wikipedia editor to change from one style to another unless there is some substantial reason for the change.”

  • LarkinDePark@lemmygrad.mlBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    I view it as a blot on Wikipedia’s credibility

    My guy isn’t aware of the https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uyghur_genocide page. Though the Talk page is funny.

    • Life2Space@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      deleted by creator

  • Bloops@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 years ago

    Just compromise and call it the ZGGCD

  • Walter Water-Walker@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 years ago

    Why not ask the Chinese government?

    • SovereignState@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      https://web.archive.org/web/20230329041436/http://m.news.xixik.com/content/5190f6ea93739da6/

      Their position seems to be… it depends, lol. But they prefer CPC.

      Personally, I prefer to use CPC because the implied accusation of ethno-supremacism is front and center in much of western news media. It’s the Chinese Communist Party – the emphasis is not so much on “Party” as the CPC has stated, in my experience, but rather on “Chinese”.

      In fact, I’d wager the Transatlantic Empire would rather the CPC drop “party” from their name altogether, as it indicates a participatory role in democratic processes. “Chinese communists” would probably be far easier to effectively scapegoat.

      CPC also rolls off the tongue easier. Also serves as sort of dogwhistle for people who are aware of all of this. I see no advantage in using see-see-pee.

      • PeeOnYou [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m sure they don’t want to give ccp any further weight that can be used against them. their answer is the smartest answer

        • SovereignState@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          see-see-PeeOnYou

          sorry, it was right there. Agreed.

          • PeeOnYou [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            nice

  • Life2Space@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    I just use both, occasionally swapping out one for the other.

Comradeship // Freechat@lemmygrad.ml

comradeship@lemmygrad.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !comradeship@lemmygrad.ml

Talk about whatever, respecting the rules established by Lemmygrad. Failing to comply with the rules will grant you a few warnings, insisting on breaking them will grant you a beautiful shiny banwall.

A community for comrades to chat and talk about whatever doesn’t fit other communities

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 110 users / day
  • 273 users / week
  • 477 users / month
  • 1.69K users / 6 months
  • 7 local subscribers
  • 2.43K subscribers
  • 1.8K Posts
  • 19.4K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Camarada Forte@lemmygrad.ml
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org