chraebsli@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 年前Stop comparing programming languagesprogramming.devimagemessage-square182linkfedilinkarrow-up1730arrow-down155file-text
arrow-up1675arrow-down1imageStop comparing programming languagesprogramming.devchraebsli@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 年前message-square182linkfedilinkfile-text
Stop comparing programming languages Python is versatile JavaScript is powerful Ruby is elegant C is essential C++ Java is robust
minus-squarexigoi@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 年前What’s the point of having a function in the standard library if the universal recommendation is to never use it?
minus-squareCanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 年前Is that the recommendation? This is the first time I’ve actually seen it discussed. I’m wondering at this point if a new, different stdlib would be better. Or just use Rust.
minus-squarexigoi@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 年前To be honest, my comment probably applies more to gets, but the point is the same.
What’s the point of having a function in the standard library if the universal recommendation is to never use it?
Is that the recommendation? This is the first time I’ve actually seen it discussed.
I’m wondering at this point if a new, different stdlib would be better. Or just use Rust.
To be honest, my comment probably applies more to
gets, but the point is the same.