• prime_number_314159@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    American kettles are significantly worse than British kettles. They run at lower voltage and lower amperage, so they take much longer to boil water.

    Given the choice between using a multipurpose microwave to do one more thing, and buying a separate appliance that is no faster, choosing to use the device you already own is entirely appropriate.

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      If you drink tea or coffee, even irregularly, a kettle is worth having.

      And a pour over is better than Keurig crap. I’d recommend using paper filters as well. Most of the time I just rinse the pour over when finished.

      Generally I grind 2-3 servings of beans at a time and store the rest in a glass container in the fridge.

      In the end, the effort is pretty comparable to a Keurig machine, but better quality, more flexibility, and you don’t have to deal with/buy pods or a machine.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      They are still the best option for heating water. At best, a microwave could match its performance if it is nearly perfectly efficient and dumping all it’s energy only into the water, which is what a kettle does. They have the same potential power draw, so they can put the same energy in as each other. A kettle’s design is perfect for heating water though.

      Unless you have an inductive stove top, an electric kettle is going to be the best option, even in the US. It’s the most efficient at putting energy into the water and, since all these options have the same power draw, it is consequently the fastest (again, assuming no inductive stove top which can draw more power).