Not a true greentext but I hope I have captured the spirit of it. (First time I wrote smth like this, don’t be harsh on me. >w<)

    • RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s just recommended to emphasize length. If your password is as long as a passphrase it’s likely more secure (harder to remember though).

      • Zachariah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        But if the point is to remember it, then you should use the security from length of series of 5+ random words. It’s easier to remember, write down, and type. All great characteristics of a master passphrase.

        • RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I don’t disagree, sorry if it sounded like I did.

          There’s just a theoretical weakness since the base word lists are usually public knowledge and bruteforcers could (and probably already have) optimize for that.

          The advantages of a passphrase outweigh though as you mentioned. An attacker would first need your repo anyway.

            • Որբունի@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              Français
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Separating some of the words with random symbols also isn’t too hard to remember and no chance that can be bruteforced.