• @ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    2141 month ago

    See your problem is you’re editing the code until it passes the tests. It’s way easier if you edit the tests until it passes the code.

    • @SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      351 month ago

      Can’t tell if you are joking. I know a lot of junior developers who think this is a legitimate solution.

      • Johanno
        link
        fedilink
        51 month ago

        I hate groovy, gradle and Jenkins!

        I don’t know if sth. Else is better but I can confirm that shit is horrific

          • Johanno
            link
            fedilink
            -11 month ago

            Horrible scripting language. Even worse than python. Close to Javascript

            • @juicy
              link
              41 month ago

              If you don’t think Python is a good scripting language, what is a good scripting language in your opinion? Bourne Shell? VBScript? PHP?

              • Johanno
                link
                fedilink
                21 month ago

                I like python and if you use typing it is awesome.

                I like kotlin script too. But normal languages are better than scripting languages usually.

                • @souperk@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  2
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  Typing in python leaves a lot to be desired… Being looking at peps for quite some time, but it’s really hard for the language to make progress without breaking compatibility.

                  Hopefully at some point MOJO becomes mature enough to use in a professional setting.

  • Pxtl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    36
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    DevOps is bad because for some reason we’ve decided to invent new programming languages that you can’t debug locally and so you have to keep pushing commits to the pipeline server. It’s bullshit.

    “Why do you write all your pipelines as shell scripts and then wrap them in yaml at the very end”?

    Because then I can run them locally quickly and test individual components of them instead of “edit, commit, push, wait 10 minutes, read error message, repeat”.

    • @biribiri11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      131 month ago

      FWIW, gitlab-runner exec and earthly exist for running tests locally, with others things like nektos/act for GHA as a 3rd party solution. I’ll never get used to yaml, though, all my pipelines are mostly shell scripts. Using a markup language as a programming language was definitely one of the decisions of all time.

      • @kugiyasan@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        230 days ago

        Gitlab-runner exec and act are great tools, but this goes out of the window as soon as the cloud hosting service is a little less intelligent (looking at you, azure DevOps, who removed the hack that let pipeline run locally in 2019)

        • @biribiri11@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          130 days ago

          That’s why earthly exists. Now you can run your pipeline on a container with a “familiar syntax” inside another container with a “familiar syntax” inside of a “reproducible, easy-to-use” VM provisioned on top of probably KVM, as Torvalds intended

    • @kometes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 month ago

      My build environment has 3 jillion unneeded builds going. I am lucky to get 2 build failures in a single day.

  • @beeng@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    281 month ago

    Local tests are less shameful. Imagine if you had a Red X online for every compiler or syntax error whilst developing.

    So it is.

  • Howdy
    link
    fedilink
    220 days ago

    As a fellow jenkins miner. I know this red (x) all too well.