L4sBot@lemmy.worldMB to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoAmazon Told Drivers Not to Worry About In-Van Surveillance Cameras. Now Footage Is Leaking Onlinewww.vice.comexternal-linkmessage-square65fedilinkarrow-up1724arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up1724arrow-down1external-linkAmazon Told Drivers Not to Worry About In-Van Surveillance Cameras. Now Footage Is Leaking Onlinewww.vice.comL4sBot@lemmy.worldMB to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square65fedilinkfile-text
Amazon Told Drivers Not to Worry About In-Van Surveillance Cameras. Now Footage Is Leaking Online::undefined
minus-squareStitch@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up39·1 year agoThis is a stronger indictment of the national work landscape than a boon for Amazon, who has a over 100% turnover rate…
minus-squaresalt@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agohow can you have a turnover rate over 100%?
minus-squaredesignatedhacker@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·1 year agoIt’s a turnover rate over time. If everyone quit and had to be replaced in a day you’d be at 100%. Anything after that is over 100% for the year. I’ve seen rates of 150% bandied around for Amazon. That means replacing 12.5% of your total headcount on average monthly.
minus-squaresalt@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·1 year agoI’m not great with math so please let me know if I’m understanding this right: Company has 100 employees All 100 employees quit Company gets 100 new employees as replacement = 100% turnover rate Then… Company has the 100 new employees 50 of the new employees quit Company gets 50 new employees as replacement = 150% turnover rate and so on?
minus-squarequicksand@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoIt simply has to do with the number of lost/new employees in a year. So if you have 100 employees on your payroll and 100 quit over the course of a year, then you have 100% turnover. If 50, then 50/100 total employees = 50% turnover. It will be lower if less people left. Here’s the link where I learned this: https://www.aihr.com/blog/how-to-calculate-employee-turnover-rate/#:~:text=How to calculate annual turnover,%3D 0.05%2C or 5%25.
minus-squarelolcatnip@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoTurnover rates are usually described annually. If a company has to replace it’s whole staff twice in a year, that’s a 200% annual turnover rate.
minus-squarejscummy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoAmazon pays pretty decently but it’s just god awful work. I worked in a warehouse briefly and made more than I had anywhere else entry level, but sorting boxes for 9 hours straight on night shifts isn’t worth it
minus-squaremoney_loo@1337lemmy.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoAgain, I agree. I’m not an executive, if I could raise the national average for all of us believe me I would.
This is a stronger indictment of the national work landscape than a boon for Amazon, who has a over 100% turnover rate…
how can you have a turnover rate over 100%?
It’s a turnover rate over time. If everyone quit and had to be replaced in a day you’d be at 100%. Anything after that is over 100% for the year.
I’ve seen rates of 150% bandied around for Amazon. That means replacing 12.5% of your total headcount on average monthly.
I’m not great with math so please let me know if I’m understanding this right:
= 100% turnover rate
Then…
= 150% turnover rate
and so on?
It simply has to do with the number of lost/new employees in a year. So if you have 100 employees on your payroll and 100 quit over the course of a year, then you have 100% turnover. If 50, then 50/100 total employees = 50% turnover. It will be lower if less people left. Here’s the link where I learned this: https://www.aihr.com/blog/how-to-calculate-employee-turnover-rate/#:~:text=How to calculate annual turnover,%3D 0.05%2C or 5%25.
Turnover rates are usually described annually. If a company has to replace it’s whole staff twice in a year, that’s a 200% annual turnover rate.
Amazon pays pretty decently but it’s just god awful work. I worked in a warehouse briefly and made more than I had anywhere else entry level, but sorting boxes for 9 hours straight on night shifts isn’t worth it
Again, I agree.
I’m not an executive, if I could raise the national average for all of us believe me I would.