• bobburger@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    He’s a voter suppressionist actively trying to get Trump elected under a thin veneer of guilt and shame. He’s appealing to people that haven’t been paying attention and think the Israeli mistreatment of Palestinians started right after October 7th, rather than in 1948. By doing this tries to claim that American support of genocide is brand new thereby absolving himself and others of the guilt associated with it, unless of course they also support The Genocide™ by voting for Joe Biden.

    More importantly he can claim that Joe Biden is the only presidential candidate that supports The Genocide™, so vote for someone else and you won’t be supporter of The Genocide™. The quiet part is that Trump never supported The Genocide™ because it never happened until Biden was president.

    • juicy
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      Don’t pretend nothing changed after October 7 or that there aren’t candidates like Jill Stein and Cornell West who oppose the genocide.

      • bobburger@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Lol okay.

        Every time people bring up Jill Stein and Cornell west as serious candidates it makes me ask how they expect either to get 270 electoral college votes. So I’ll ask you, the serious progressive advocating for Jill Stein and Cornell West, how does either one of them get 270 electoral college votes? Hopefully you can do better than the last guy who’s response was “just tell people their ideas and then get votes”.

        I also think its telling you couldn’t even pick one candidate. You’re convinced 3rd party candidates are our saviors but instead of picking ONE candidate to support, you take the shotgun approach and throw out a bunch of names and hope one of them sticks. There isn’t even a single 3rd party candidate you support, but you’re desperately telling me to pick one, any one, as long as it isn’t Genociden Biden, because they oppose The Genocide™. Vote for anyone else and I’ll be showing I don’t support The Gencoide™ either.

        Even if I were convinced that either of them could get elected, I am not convinced that either have the political capital to govern in an effective manner, much less change the course of America’s support for Israel. So what you’re really advocating for is for me to help Donald Trump get elected on the infinitesimal chance that a miracle candidate could get elected and then have no practical impact on Israels actions.

        All that aside, little has changed since October 7th other than Putin’s boy Benjamin Netanyahu seizing the opportunity to start a war that will keep him in power as long as it’s going on.

        What’s even more important to Palestinians than the 40,000 or so dead Gazans is the day after the war. Will it result in full occupation and control of Palestinian territory by Isreal, which would be the final stages of the slow burn genocide. A plan which Trump endorses.

        Or will it be a general withdrawal and return of Gaza to Palestinian control, which has the possibility of a two state solution. A plan that Biden says he supports.

        Either way, Israel is a sovereign country with it’s own hopes and ambitions. Any American president has only limited ability to impact their decisions. This election is a choice between using our little influence to push towards a two state solution or push towards full Israeli control of Palestinian territory.

        • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          lol okay. every time people say they don’t know how someone gets 270 electoral college votes, it makes me ask if they know how electoral college votes are allocated. so i’ll ask you: how do candidates earn electoral college votes?

          i also think it’s telling that you are condescending and dismissive toward your interlocutors, dredging out red herrings and smoke screens instead of dealing with what they actually said, and relying heavily on appeals to ridicule.

          even if i were convinced you were engaging in good faith, i’m not convinced you could see past the bad faith propaganda you’re regurgitating.

          all that aside, no party owns the votes of any voter. it is the responsibility of the candidates to earn votes. voters are making it clear that they want the genocide to be stopped, and some candidates are making it clear they aren’t going to do that, while others are making it a centerpiece of their campaigns.