Many voters believe, with good reason, that none of this would have happened without Biden’s assent. Biden has continued to speak of Israel’s attack on Palestinian civilians using the absurd language of “self-defense”. He has insulted Jewish Americans and the memory of the Holocaust by invoking them to justify the slaughter. And though his White House repeatedly leaks that he is “privately” dismayed by Israel’s conduct of the war, he has done little to stop the flow of US money and guns that support it.

Even after the US state department issued a vexed and mealy-mouthed report on Israel’s conduct, which nevertheless concluded that it was reasonable to assess that Israel was in violation of international humanitarian law, the Biden administration has continued to fund these violations. That state department report was published on 10 May. The Biden administration told Congress that it intends to move forward with a $1bn arms sale to Israel. “OK, [Israel] likely broke the law, but not enough to change policy,” is how one reporter summarized the administration’s judgment. “So, what is the point of the report? I mean, in the simplest terms, what’s the point?”

Meanwhile, Biden has expressed public disdain for the Americans – many of whom he needs to vote for him – who have taken to protest on behalf of Palestinian lives. Speaking with evident approval of the violent police crackdowns against anti-genocide student demonstrations, he said coolly: “Dissent must never lead to disorder.”

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      I wonder if this isn’t overblown propaganda. Personally, and I know this is just my experience, but I’ve never met a person who isn’t a Trump supporter who isn’t voting for Biden. I’m sure they exist, and I want to keep seeing stories like this to encourage Biden to do better, and scare moderates to make sure they show up in November.

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Republicans vote for their candidate and against their opponents. Democrats historically only show up in support. Just look at the 2016 election.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          7 months ago

          And yet Biden keeps making it harder to support him. He’s been in politics for half a century. He has to know that Democratic turnout is depressed when they only have someone to vote against.

      • Wrench@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        My far left friend wrote in Bernies name in 2016.

        He did not play stupid games in 2020, and I suspect in 2024, though I haven’t talked to him about it.

        As left as he is, he has known what another Trump presidency means since 2021 with no ambiguity. Anyone pretending otherwise at this point isn’t arguing in good faith.

        • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          ^ THIS. I’d so much rather be voting for a Bernie right now, but the reality is…there are two choices, and that is it. Not voting for Biden is helping Ronald McDonald.

    • beardown@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      The choice is fascism or neo liberalism

      Why is that the choice in what is supposedly the most free country in history?

        • beardown@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Biden is not as bad as Trump

          Agreed. Though there is the argument that neoliberalism leads to Trump/fascism. So a vote for Dems/Neoliberals/Biden is just prolonging the inevitable - which, even if true, is still worth prolonging

          I might end up voting third party

          Unless you live in a swing state, then you might as well - there’s really no reason for voters in California or Oklahoma, for instance, to vote blue/red. And 2000 and 2016 demonstrate that popular vote victories have extremely limited moral/political significance.

    • JoBo@feddit.ukOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      7 months ago

      Obediently voting for the least worst option means you eventually run out of good options. <- we are here

      The conundrum is working out how you force those options to get better without accelerationists getting to test out their theories for real (again).

      I would respectifully suggest that “shut the fuck up and vote” does not cut it.

          • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            There’s not now, nor will there ever be a perfect choice. Fact is that all US presidents have, to some extent, blood on their hands. Is the choice this year bad? Yes. But all previous presidents in recent times supplied arms to regimes like Saudi Arabia, Israel etc. In the past the US itself committed its own genocide on native Americans, interned Japanese, killed hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese, invaded Iraq and Afghanistan etc etc. And with all these atrocities, voting the lesser evil helped (a bit). Perfect is not for sale this year, nor will it ever be.

              • BaldProphet@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                7 months ago

                Associating Joe Biden so closely with genocide demonstrates a lack of capacity for understanding nuance. Supporting Israel doesn’t automatically equate to supporting Netanyahu’s genocide in Gaza, but it does indicate support for the Israeli (and by extension, Jewish) right to exist. One can simultaneously protest the genocide in Gaza and support a friendly, cooperative Israel.

                • beardown@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  The United States is committing genocide against the Palestinian people in the same way that you would be committing murder if you hired a hitman to kill someone

                  We are knowingly providing Israel with the funds and arms to commit genocide. Therefore, we are committing genocide. Therefore, Biden is committing genocide.

                  Trump is worse. But Biden is the worst president since Nixon, and possibly since the Native American Genocides successfully ended.

                  He is a monster. No matter how much student debt he forgives or how many roads he claims to build

        • JoBo@feddit.ukOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Demanding that people vote for the least worst option without any content other than sneering at them for apparently not realising that one of the options is worse, is doing exactly that.

          It’s straw-manning the arguments of people who want (and desperately need) the Democrats to be better and are putting serious thought, time and energy into how that is possible in a world controlled by billionaires who unleash fascism the moment their power is threatened.

          And they’re doing it with a lazy, cynical, Bill Maher-wannabe take because apparently they think this is a good look?

          They’ll be the death of us all.

            • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              If you want a third party candidate to have a chance of winning or even influencing politics then you have to actually vote third party. My comment was no more in bad faith than the people who dogmatically shout “vote blue no matter who.” or “A vote for third party is a vote for trump.” or some other condescending remark. The point is that people like to try to brow-beat others into voting for candidates that they also claim don’t represent them. I’ve long been tired of making fear-based political decisions just so I can elect someone who doesn’t represent me. If it’s truly only a choice between some guy I don’t like and some guy who will end democracy, then you have no real choice and Democracy has already ended -if it ever began. I will likely be voting for Cornel West or Green Party (as I did during the last General Election) because I actually like and agree with their proposed policy, not because I’m scared of someone else winning. So yes we could really use your vote even if it’s just to get us to 5%. If you choose not to then that is your choice, and at least we are offering you that.

        • JoBo@feddit.ukOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I thought Uncommitted was a smart use of the primaries.

          More generally, obviously much more critical than in the election itself. But getting the right candidates in the primary, and pushing all candidates to be better in all the usual ways. They’re never going to chase us to the left like they chase to the right, so we have to do the work and set the boundaries.

      • Tiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Can you please suggest one candidate other than Biden who has a realistic chance of winning against Trump?

        Name one single candidate running right now

        • JoBo@feddit.ukOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          The Democrats do not have a realistic chance of winning against Trump because the Democrats are entirely incapable of challenging power. It’s the fundamental contradiction of liberalism. They won’t do anything for the people they need to vote for them because if they do the people who fund them will stop funding them.

          Obama and Sanders both excelled at small-dollar donations, of course. Sadly, Obama was a silver-tongued coward and the Clinton Democrats made sure she didn’t repeat the mistakes of 2008 in 2016 by not bothering to sign up voters in case they killed her in the primaries again.

          They dig their own grave and they do so willingly because it makes them exceedingly rich.

    • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      7 months ago

      Neoliberalism is fascism and there is no lesser evil, only evil. He should not be rewarded with reelection if he won’t listen to the demands of the public. That’s how we got to the point where the only option is which senile pedo rapist to choose from.

      • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        The pedo rapist in the end already shows the difference between the candidates. Vote for the guy that has not been accused of rape.

        • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          So, not voting means more dead bodies. Essentially. More dead children. In more places like Gaza.

          And if the cons (and apparently some tankies) get their way, it will mean many more here in the U.S.

        • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          Y’all keep acting like we don’t end up with plenty of dead kids anyway.

          Fuck this country, I’m done.

          You guys have fun playing like your decision matters.

        • The Uncanny Observer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          How is electing Biden going to mean less dead kids in Gaza? He’s still supporting Israel, and he literally just said that US support was ironclad and that no genocide is happening. It doesn’t matter who wins in November, those kids are still going to die, and ultimately that’s on Americans because we supply the weapons and protect Israel from consequences, with force if necessary.

          Gaza is done for, everyone there will be killed by the direct actions of the United States and Israel, and voting for Biden isn’t going to absolve anyone for the guilt we all share for that. That’s on you, that’s on me, and that’s on every other American, both Democrat or Republican. No amount of moralizing or “lesser of two evils” bullshit on your part is going to change that. You need to come to terms with the fact that you have a hand in that genocide, and you’re just as guilty as Biden is.