misk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months agoFBI Arrests Man For Generating AI Child Sexual Abuse Imagerywww.404media.coexternal-linkmessage-square297fedilinkarrow-up1535arrow-down126
arrow-up1509arrow-down1external-linkFBI Arrests Man For Generating AI Child Sexual Abuse Imagerywww.404media.comisk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square297fedilink
minus-squareMaggoty@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·7 months agoLet’s see here, listen to my therapist who has decades of real experience or a study from over 20 years ago? Sorry bud, I know who I’m going with on this and it ain’t your academic.
minus-squareTranscendentalEmpire@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·7 months ago Let’s see here, listen to my therapist who has decades of real experience or a study from over 20 years ago? Your therapist is still utilizing Freudian psychoanalysis? Well, if age is a factor in your opinion about the validity of the care you receive, I have some bad news for you…
minus-squareMaggoty@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·7 months agoYou’re still using 5,000 year old Armenian shoes? Of course not. Stop being reductive.
minus-squareTranscendentalEmpire@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·7 months agoLol, you were the one who first dismissed evidence because it was 20 years old…
minus-squareMaggoty@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 months agoThe point is you can reduce anything to its origin. That does not mean it’s still the same thing.
minus-squareTranscendentalEmpire@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·7 months ago The point is you can reduce anything to its origin. Okay, but how does the modern version of cathartic theory differ from what freud postulated? I agree you can’t reduce things based on its original alone , which is why I included a scientific source as evidence…
minus-squareMaggoty@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·7 months agoI don’t know, that’s why I have a therapist, I’m not educated in psychology. But I do recognize a logical fallacy when I see one.
minus-squareTranscendentalEmpire@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·7 months ago But I do recognize a logical fallacy when I see one. I doubt that, so far your argument has been based on the anecdotal fallacy mixed with a bit of the appeal to authority fallacy.
minus-squareMaggoty@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·7 months agoLmao. Says the guy who tried to use a study on aggression to address sexual urges.
Let’s see here, listen to my therapist who has decades of real experience or a study from over 20 years ago?
Sorry bud, I know who I’m going with on this and it ain’t your academic.
Your therapist is still utilizing Freudian psychoanalysis?
Well, if age is a factor in your opinion about the validity of the care you receive, I have some bad news for you…
You’re still using 5,000 year old Armenian shoes?
Of course not. Stop being reductive.
Lol, you were the one who first dismissed evidence because it was 20 years old…
The point is you can reduce anything to its origin. That does not mean it’s still the same thing.
Okay, but how does the modern version of cathartic theory differ from what freud postulated?
I agree you can’t reduce things based on its original alone , which is why I included a scientific source as evidence…
I don’t know, that’s why I have a therapist, I’m not educated in psychology. But I do recognize a logical fallacy when I see one.
I doubt that, so far your argument has been based on the anecdotal fallacy mixed with a bit of the appeal to authority fallacy.
Lmao. Says the guy who tried to use a study on aggression to address sexual urges.