• TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    understand that the theory supposedly applies to other areas as well, but as you so helpfully pointed out: the theory doesn’t seem to hold up.

    My original claim was that cathartic theory in and of itself is not founded on evidence based research.

    but at the same time, the theory is totally correct! (when it’s convenient to you, that is)

    When did I claim it was ever correct?

    I think you are misconstruing my original claim with the claims made by the cathartic theory itself.

    I don’t claim that cathartic theory is beneficial in any way, you are the one claiming that Cathartic theory is correct for sexual aggression, but not for violence.

    Do you have a source that claims cathartic theory is beneficial for satiation deviant sexual impulses?

    then the claim of a link between sexuality and aggression is also without support, until you provide a source for that claim.

    You are wanting me to provide an evidence based claim between the two when I’ve already said the overarching theory is not based on evidence?

    The primary principle to establish is the theory of cathartic relief, not wether it works for one emotion or the other. You have not provided any evidence to support that claim, I have provided evidence that disputes it.