readbeanicecream@kbin.social to Technology@kbin.social · 1 年前Judge in US v. Google trial didn’t know if Firefox is a browser or search enginearstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up124arrow-down10file-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmit.onlinehackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.partyglobalnews@lemmy.zip
arrow-up124arrow-down1external-linkJudge in US v. Google trial didn’t know if Firefox is a browser or search enginearstechnica.comreadbeanicecream@kbin.social to Technology@kbin.social · 1 年前message-square6fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmit.onlinehackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.partyglobalnews@lemmy.zip
minus-squareSokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 年前We definitely need technology judges and legislatures with a history in the industry or robust training. They make and rule on the laws and they don’t even understand the subjects they’re legislating.
minus-squareMidnitte@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 年前They need the judge that heard the Google Oracle API case - actually seemed to understand the implications of copyrighting APIs
We definitely need technology judges and legislatures with a history in the industry or robust training. They make and rule on the laws and they don’t even understand the subjects they’re legislating.
deleted by creator
They need the judge that heard the Google Oracle API case - actually seemed to understand the implications of copyrighting APIs