Although document.all is also falsy and loosely equal to undefined, it is not undefined. The case of document.all having type “undefined” is classified in the web standards as a “willful violation” of the original ECMAScript standard for web compatibility.
Then the bastard tries to willingly access x to equate it to undefined, but that can’t work since x is undefined and yields a ReferenceError (rendering the third expression moot).
The monks answers of document.all is not applicable since document.all is a live set of data which can be nothing or everything.
Who even introduced document.all? I bet it was microsoft…
I can’t test it right now but I would love to know. Is it true?
Seems to be so, see Exceptional behavior of document.all
No, it’s undefined
not strictly
typeof x === "undefined"
is true.Then the bastard tries to willingly access
x
to equate it toundefined
, but that can’t work sincex
is undefined and yields aReferenceError
(rendering the third expression moot).The monks answers of document.all is not applicable since
document.all
is a live set of data which can be nothing or everything.Who even introduced
document.all
? I bet it was microsoft…