I’ve dabbled with Linux over the years, first with Ubuntu in the early 2010s, then Elementary OS when that dropped, and a few years ago I really enjoyed how customizable the gui was with Xubuntu. I was able to make it look just like WIndows 2000 which was really cool.

Which current distro has the best GUI, in your opinion? I find modern Ubuntu to feel a little basic and cheap. I guess I don’t really like modern Gnome. I’m currently using Windows 10 LTSC which is probably the best possible version of Windows, but I’d jump to linux if I could find a distro with a gui that feels at least as polished and feature rich as Windows 10 LTSC.

  • SveetPickle@beehaw.org
    1·
    1 year ago

    I used the Pop Os default for a long time and just recently switched to i3 Manjaro, it’s been pretty nice once you get past the learning curve of i3

    • T0RB1T@lemmy.ca
      1·
      1 year ago

      I’m pretty sure I’m legally required to post this anytime someone says they use Manjaro.

      Manjaro was the first thing to get me to stop distro-hopping, so it pains me to admit that historically, it’s been a very messy project. I’ve since moved onto openSUSE Tumbleweed and love it (I’ve also dabbled in NixOS, but it’s a lot more hardcore).

      If anyone wants the ease of Manjaro, with an Arch base, my understanding is that you should consider EndeavourOS.

      Also, if you like i3 but want to use Wayland for any of its superior features, consider SwayWM.

      • SveetPickle@beehaw.org
        0·
        1 year ago

        Is there a reason to consider sway if I don’t personally care about visual stuff and just like the way that tiling window managers function. The out of the box i3 manjaro look is perfectly fine for me visually speaking. I intend on eventually learning vanilla arch or something similar when I get more free time, but I mostly just use Linux cause fuck Microsoft and Apple.

        • T0RB1T@lemmy.ca
          1·
          1 year ago

          The reason is Wayland.

          Largely the only difference between i3 and Sway is that i3 is built for X, and Sway uses wlroots, a Wayland compositor. Sway was designed to function as a drop-in replacement for i3, your config should even be 99% compatible.

          Since X is essentially a dead project, and Wayland is supposed to be the next step… some people want to make an effort to move away from X… Some people don’t.

          But it’s not really about “visual stuff”. It’s about technical debt, and a bunch of stuff I don’t understand.

          • SveetPickle@beehaw.org
            1·
            1 year ago

            Ah ok, that gives me a better idea of what you meant! I can do my own research from there. I definitely don’t wanna stay on a dead project especially when I’m still in the learning stage, much easier to learn now than to relearn later.

            • T0RB1T@lemmy.ca
              1·
              1 year ago

              Keep in mind that these transitional periods in software can be painful, but generally the replacement is aimed to be painless.

              The nice thing about Wayland is that development is mature enough that we can see where it’s headed, even if it’s not all complete. Most of the available options that use Wayland make it pretty seamless. You won’t have to relearn much between sway and i3. You also won’t have to relearn anything switching to Wayland in the future if you are already using GNOME or KDE Plasma, for example…

              • SveetPickle@beehaw.org
                1·
                1 year ago

                True! I was reading about wayland and sway. I won’t be switching anytime soon as I have a Nvidia Graphics card and I like to play games and the support doesn’t seem to be there quite yet.