• frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Their incentive is money. All this is teaching them is that they need to find a different approach to do the same thing.

    The AAA outfits are trash and should die.

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sorry, the argument is they should have zero consequences for trying something reviled because they abandoned it later? And that will make them not try similar things later, because of reasons?

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The “argument” is that a few people said people should reward them doing the right thing eventually but others somehow think that’s evil or some weird ass shit.

          It’s not complicated, as much as Internet weirdos want it to be

          • barsquid@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            They are being rewarded for doing the right thing simply by people not continuing to refund.

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Ok it’s just weird to me that people like you have some moral objection to a slightly different attitude applied to reviews. It’s not something worth talking about.