• ivanafterall@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Are you suggesting the four women are lying? I don’t care to “debunk” anything. It’s sufficient for me to know that he’s a sex pest and a Christian. Like peanut butter and jelly.

    • 乇ㄥ乇¢ㄒ尺ㄖ@infosec.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Are you suggesting the four women are lying?

      NO, I’m saying don’t be superficial and believe what everyone says just because they said it, these are not facts yet

      It’s sufficient for me to know that he’s a sex pest and a Christian.

      Ahh, the famous personal attack fallacy stikes again, I’ll gave you an example

      Let’s say a person named Elizabeth is a deer hunter, you see her take her rifle and go deer hunting every couple of weeks, then you say something like : she cannot possibly support gun control laws…

      And that’s a flawed reasoning, being a hunter is used as a negative characteristic to make a conclusion which could be very well untrue, Elizabeth could support many gun control laws while owning a rifle.

      Let’s go back to Russell, you’re dismissing anything he says because he’s “Christian and sex pest”… The problem here is that your conclusion came from a characterization that has nothing to do with arguments he made or the real stance he holds… Which is all there in the video

      UNLESS…

      you have some … let’s say aggressive opinions against christians, that you’re willing to dismiss anything they say, and favor anyone who oppose them instead regardless whether their claim is true or false…

      which one is it ?