• @starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        0
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/exploit

        Scroll down to verbs. When you’re talking about someone else, there’s an implication of unfairness. This is why vegans don’t eat animals or use animal products. If the animals could consent, there would be nothing wrong with it.

        I reiterate: it would not be unfair for Astarion or Lenore to drain several pints of blood from my neck

          • @starman2112@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            22 months ago

            And exploitation, when talking about living things, implies unfairness and nonconsent

            You realize the word becomes entirely useless if we use your definition, yeah? Virtually every interaction between living things becomes exploitation under your silly definition. It’s not very useful. I’ll stick with the more widely used definition, wherein it would be exploitation for Nosferatu to suck my blood, but not Mavis Dracula or her dad

            • @commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              22 months ago

              Virtually every interaction between living things becomes exploitation under your silly definition.

              yea. it is. but the vegan society’s definition doesn’t prohibit exploiting living things: it prohibits exploiting animals.

            • @commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              12 months ago

              the word becomes entirely useless if we use your definition, yeah?

              i disagree. i think it draws sharp contrasts that help us understand both the standard and whether we are meeting it.