• FiniteBanjo
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Texas boggles my mind because it’s such a blue state with some of the deepest red politicians running the place.

        • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          Congressional districts should have a perimiter-area ratio limit, and the largest district should not be allowed to contain 10% more people than the smallest district.

          • FiniteBanjo
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            I like that and it would probably work better than suing over a gerrymandered map only for the courts to uphold the crazy district, exactly what happened with the Texas 2nd Congressional District map.

            Honestly with our current level of technology, a more direct democracy approach like a popular vote representation based on stance alignment would probably work better. For example, Average Joe would optionally select a party and then vote on policies, and the representatives would have selected their policies to align with constituents. Policies and candidates on ballot would be chosen through a regular primary, so each party might have separate policies on the ballot. Independents could select a mix of each and get automatically assigned a politician.

            I bet the GOP wouldn’t even oppose it because they love forcing people to commit to a party.

    • Halosheep@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      A whole lot of empty land seems to have really important votes, since theirs seems to count for more than mine.