• Krono
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    To clarify, that case was thrown out becuase plaintiffs lacked standing.

    To further clarify, the court threw out 2 of the claims due to lack of standing. The other 4 claims were dismissed on the merits.

    The court held that the plaintiffs’ claims of fraud, negligent misrepresentation, consumer law violations, and unjust enrichment failed on the merits and directed those claims to be dismissed with prejudice. The court held that plaintiffs’ claims of negligence and breach of fiduciary duty failed for lack of standing,