CaractacusPotts@lemmy.caM to palestine news and politics@lemmy.caEnglish · 5 months agoIsraeli phosphorus shells burn south Lebanon after fierce Hezbollah attacksthecradle.coexternal-linkmessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up147arrow-down13
arrow-up144arrow-down1external-linkIsraeli phosphorus shells burn south Lebanon after fierce Hezbollah attacksthecradle.coCaractacusPotts@lemmy.caM to palestine news and politics@lemmy.caEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square7fedilink
minus-squareKronolinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down1·5 months agoSo in this latest tit-for-tat, the “terrorist organization” precisely targeted a military vehicle. Then, “the most moral army in the world” responded by dropping internationally banned chemical agent on a few towns.
minus-squareSkyezOpen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·5 months agoWP isn’t banned outright, using it on people is a war crime though.
minus-squareNosferatuZodd@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·5 months agowhat’s the difference? other than being pedantic?
minus-squareSkyezOpen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·5 months agoIt has legitimate uses for illumination and smokescreen cover. Saying it’s “banned” is objectively incorrect.
minus-squarechingadera@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·5 months agoUnmanned objectives exist in war
So in this latest tit-for-tat, the “terrorist organization” precisely targeted a military vehicle.
Then, “the most moral army in the world” responded by dropping internationally banned chemical agent on a few towns.
WP isn’t banned outright, using it on people is a war crime though.
what’s the difference? other than being pedantic?
It has legitimate uses for illumination and smokescreen cover. Saying it’s “banned” is objectively incorrect.
Unmanned objectives exist in war