• BuelldozerA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    First link: Members of A Company, so you’re looking at 100 people maximum and likely less. Not exactly a large fighting force.

    Second link: There’s nothing “quiet” about it. It’s been blaring on Western News non-stop for about 6 years now. The US has been completely open about weapons sales and training schedules.

    Third link: We gave President Tsai Ing-Wen a medal. Okay, and?

      • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s amazing that this gets any downvotes at all.

        Washington Post 1991: Innocence Abroad: the New World of Spyless Coups

        “A lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA,” agrees [NED cofounder Allen] Weinstein.

        New York Times, 1997: Political Meddling by Outsiders: Not New for U.S.

        The National Endowment for Democracy, created 15 years ago to do in the open what the Central Intelligence Agency has done surreptitiously for decades, spends $30 million a year to support things like political parties, labor unions, dissident movements and the news media in dozens of countries, including China.

    • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      not a fighting force

      Genuine question, I know tone is hard to read online but I promise I’m not trying to be snarky: do you know the role that special forces in general and green berets in particular play in US proxy wars? They don’t fight, they raise and train local militias how to do insurgency and kill political enemies. Anytime green berets are in a country next door to an enemy of the US empire, it’s because they’re training the next ARVN, Taliban or Azov Battalion.