The last shot I posted gained some traction, so I felt like sharing some more of what I’ve done with my scanner camera. The scan is done from top to bottom in about 2 minutes, the model did a great job of staying still throughout.

While scanning motion is definitely eye-catching and spectacular, there are other qualities to appreciate. The gorgeous soft, yet tack sharp aesthetic of large format photography is easily available with a scanner.

Usually I fight the IR-super sensitivity of the sensor, but this time it made her skin iridescent against the rock in the background.

  • @lechatron
    link
    English
    411 days ago

    That’s interesting! I assume you’re using some kind of pinhole camera setup that focuses the light on the top of the scanner tray? Would really love to see what the camera looks like!

    • @Leavingoldhabits@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      711 days ago

      In basic principle it’s a pinhole camera using a scanner as the photosensitive surface. I’ve stuck a magnifier glass to the front, it gives some sharpness and a lot of possibilities outside of a simple pinhole.

      There’s a picture of the camera in my comment history, its violently unimpressive

      • @lechatron
        link
        English
        411 days ago

        Pretty much what I expected it to look like! It’s really interesting and I bet will make for some fun photos. Basically a very slow horizontal shutter.

        • @Leavingoldhabits@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          110 days ago

          You’re spot on, it’s a really slow rolling shutter. I like the idea of focusing in on what is normally considered an undesirable artifact and elevating it to become the centerpiece. Messing around with motion gets some wild results and is a lot of fun!

      • @IMALlama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        111 days ago

        What kind of angle of view do you think you get with this setup? I imagine it would be pretty wide, but could be way off.

        • @Leavingoldhabits@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          210 days ago

          I’m not really one for numbers, and I don’t know understand your question.

          If a 180 degree cone in front of the lens is the widest, I think this setup can do something like 80 degrees, and does its best work between 50 to 70. That said, this purely finger in weather approximation, I’m not really interested in the numbers when I do these shots

          • @IMALlama@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            110 days ago

            Thanks! If you happen to also shoot traditional cameras, speaking in terms of say FF EQ focal lengths works too. It does indeed sound pretty wide, with a sweet spot between 24mm and 35mm FF EQ.