How is it possible, that Signal still only provides a .deb package and no .rpm, or even better AppImage or Flatpak? There is an unofficial Flatpak but is it secure?

  • @theorangeninjaOP
    link
    312 days ago

    Sounds like a hacky way to do things, I don’t think I’m comfortable with that.

    • @ericjmorey@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      13
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      Building from source is the opposite of hacky. It’s the recommended way to deal with things like this where you are concerned about trust and security. I understand that it’s not something you’ve done before, but it not as complicated as it sounds. There are many tutorials on how to build programs from source.

      I understand that providing official packages for fedora/rhel, Ubuntu/debian, and arch-based distro packages along with a flatpack and Appimage would make a lot of sense, but for whatever reason, signal has decided not to. Perhaps you can message the signal team to ask why they choose not to do this.

      • @theorangeninjaOP
        link
        412 days ago

        Appreciated, maybe I’ll try it in the future.

      • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        211 days ago

        Sometimes it comes down to support. For every distro specific format you build and package for, the more you need to do with every release (and need the proper config and to be comfortable packaging for each).