• BuelldozerA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    This echoes generic fear mongering of regulation from the conservative side.

    No it acknowledges that changes that can be made from one administration to the next.

    What are some bad things the EPA has done in your mind?

    This took nearly 30 years.

    Saying the government shouldn’t have the power to regulate emissions that are destroying the biosphere is absurd.

    I haven’t said that nor would I but $GovernmentAgency isn’t a synonym for “The Government”. What’s being discussed are the limits of an Agency attached to the Executive Branch relative to the power of the Legislative Branch.

    What does “but will it always” do good things even mean?

    This, this right here is what it means.

    The Trump Administration Rolled Back More Than 100 Environmental Rules.

    That’s what can happen when an Agency of the Executive “does things” on its own authority.

    If the EPA ever start doing truly asinine things, then we elect leaders to change the laws dictating their mandate.

    How’s that been working out for the last 20 years?

    • spidermanchild@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      The reality is everything is at risk with a fascist anti-environmentalist leader, especially if they have a majority of Congress and the courts. I just don’t see how exercising additional restraint with respect to fuel economy standards, as if that creates opportunities for abuse down the road, helps anything here. The EPA is following the law, and should keep doing that. Your example with asbestos is just the EPA not regulating harder, so let’s applaud harder regulation.

      As to the last 20 years, considering the makeup of Congress, I’d say the IRA was monumental.