The US swimmer Lia Thomas, who rose to global prominence after becoming the first transgender athlete to win a NCAA college title in March 2022, has lost a legal case against World Aquatics at the court of arbitration for sport – and with it any hopes of making next month’s Paris Olympics.

The 25-year-old also remains barred from swimming in the female category after failing to overturn rules introduced by swimming’s governing body in the summer of 2022, which prohibit anyone who has undergone “any part of male puberty” from the female category.

Thomas had argued that those rules should be declared “invalid and unlawful” as they were contrary to the Olympic charter and the World Aquatics constitution.

However, in a 24-page decision, the court concluded that Thomas was “simply not entitled to engage with eligibility to compete in WA competitions” as someone who was no longer a member of US swimming.

The news was welcomed by World Aquatics, who hailed it as “a major step forward in our efforts to protect women’s sport”.

  • BuelldozerA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    https://boysvswomen.com/#/

    That’s about as straightforward and easy to understand as it can possibly be. Many times Women’s Olympic Finalists wouldn’t qualify for the boys high school varsity team!

    • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      And again, although that is interesting it still doesn’t show the numbers that were quoted …

      No but taking the top 10% from each male and female athletes and putting them against each other, the men would still be on top 80% of the time.

      • BuelldozerA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m not impugning anyone in any way with this comment but the very best biologically female athletes in the world, literal World Record setting Olympians, in many cases aren’t fast enough to compete with High School boys.

        This is an even worse outcome than “Top 10% female athletes…” because this is the top 1% of female athletes, the crème de la crème, compared to the top *under age male *athletes.

        There’s a lot of events, such as 100m to 800m sprints, where the female Olympians not only lose they can’t even qualify for the race!

        In other events, swimming in particular, the biologically female Olympic Champions set World Record times…that were beaten by High School Boys.

        You can follow the links to the raw data and do the math yourself if you want a precision answer but there’s no real question that the Top 10% of biologically female athletes, the Olympians, would lose to the Top 10% of biologically male athletes 80% of the time or more.

      • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m going to quote what you wrote to me on another post: "If you don’t understand, far be it from to educate you.

        Go read a book."

        The person showed you a citation that shows in track and field the top 0.1% (not 10%) of women would get 6 medals vs the top highschool boys (who are outside the top 10% of men) getting 81 medals. That’s young boys beating the absolute best women 93% of the time. In swimming it was worse: 1 medal vs 47 or 98%. In soccer, the US Women’s National Team, arguably the best of the best women’s team in the world, would regularly lose to highschool boys teams. I’m sure there are some sports where the gulf is smaller, but it’s going to be rare.