This is a good example of how copyright’s continuing obsession with ownership and control of digital material is warping the entire legal system in the EU. What was supposed to be simply a fair way of rewarding creators has resulted in a monstrous system of routine government surveillance carried out on hundreds of millions of innocent people just in case they copy a digital file.

  • Kairos
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    Both cases the author retains copyright.

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      So the question isn’t if ordinary people can exert copyright over their content, they absolutely can.

      The reason people seem unaware of this is because the crux is that other then a rare exception no ordinary person can sue a megaorg like google or meta and win. For mostly trying to find a literal army of lawyers and corrupt bureaucrats would be mental health suicide.

      That’s exactly how capitalism likes it and thats how they stay on top in a position to lobby lawmakers, which is yet another thing you are definitely legally allowed to do as an individual.