• @WldFyre@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      4829 days ago

      That’s like saying state secrets are protected under the 1st lol

      I don’t think it’s true

        • @Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          1728 days ago

          While courts have ruled source code is first amendment protected. Your statement is still very very wrong. Just because it’s first amendment protected doesn’t mean it can’t be classified normally or made illegal to leak because of ITAR.

          But go leak some of the source code from XKeyscore or a schematic of a pair of GPNVG if you’d like to test our code classification and ITAR systems.

          • Possibly linux
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -328 days ago

            I’m not taking about sealing some government secrets. I’m taking about building a fun hobby project with some sort of targeting system. Think a small rocket that drops a payload or a water balloon launcher.

            • @Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              628 days ago

              Okay but that has no relevance at all to what the comment you were replying to was about. Companies contracted by the government and DOD specifically to create rockets are guaranteed to be covered by ITAR. Meaning open sourcing them would be impossible, regardless of the first amendment or anything else.

              There’s a massive massive difference between the software for a DOD contracted rocket like SpaceX makes, and hobbyist rocketry.

    • @FiniteBanjo
      link
      1429 days ago

      I think there has always been and always will be exceptions for military technology.