• @cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    471 month ago

    The court is the highest UN body for hearing disputes between states. Its rulings are final and binding but have been ignored in the past, reports Reuters. The court has no enforcement powers.

    • @Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      251 month ago

      And that’s by design by the Big 5.

      Just like their veto power at the Security Council making sure that they don’t even get to condemn atrocities officially.

    • @maynarkh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 month ago

      It’s less of a court in the traditional sense, and more of an indicator and shaper of international sentiment.

        • @maynarkh@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 month ago

          Was it? Look at Germany or the rest of the EU for example. It would make it much easier to argue for divestments and sanctions in parliaments if there was an active warrant against Bibi.

          • @cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 month ago

            I guess i meant civilian sentiment and not political sentiment. It seems like there is a gap between these, in this case

            • @maynarkh@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 month ago

              I don’t know how accurate it is, but I seem to see the Right Wing Cinematic Universe being on Israel’s side internationally.

    • @olafurp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 month ago

      Yeah, it’s definitely not going to be enforced but it’s still breaking the Genocide Convention. It basically says that in the future Israel might not comply with international treaties if it doesn’t feel like it. This makes them hard to work with as a country.

      Then there is also bilateral actions such as sanctions as a tool to put pressure.