• @FireRetardant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    21 month ago

    Most of North America has been built to prioritize the big ass SUV making the alternatives more difficult (farther distances) and often dangerous (bicycles gutters)

      • @FireRetardant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        0
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Mostly government standards making bigger vehicles easier to pass emissions regulations.

        Also wide lanes and large parking spots.

        • @blazera@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 month ago

          Thats not priority, cars dont have a more difficult time driving in wider lanes or parking in bigger spots. None of this is any excuse for your choice to buy a big ass SUV.

          • @FireRetardant@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            11 month ago

            Even if we replaced all the big ass SUVs with cars we would have a lot of the same issues for cyclists, pedestrians and transit.

            The infrastructure has been built to priotize private motor vehicles over active transport or transit, zoning is done assuming everyone owns a motorized vehicle. The market has been influenced by regulations and general attitude to sell bigger SUVs and trucks over sedans.

            • @blazera@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 month ago

              yes, our infrastructure does prioritize dangerous high speed motor vehicles. Im fully behind any efforts to build less car-centric infrastructure. But right now, that is something out of the average person’s hands, they do need a motor vehicle to function in society today so I cant criticize them for that. But the trend of bigger SUVs and trucks is absolutely in the average person’s hands.