The notion that Biden represents a lesser evil compared to the chaotic reign of Trump is a common argument. However, we must not forget that there exists a moral threshold below which neither choice is acceptable. To suggest that enabling a literal genocide can be considered a lesser evil is a morally bankrupt stance.

Saying that voting for Biden is a moral obligation to prevent the return of Trump perpetuates a dangerous fallacy. It implies that the democratic party is immune from scrutiny and accountability, no matter the atrocities they commit. This line of thinking allows for a never-ending cycle of justification, as long as there’s somebody considered worse, the democrats are granted a blank check. This is nothing more than a form of gaslighting, manipulating the public into believing that their only choice is between two evils, rather than demanding a better standard of leadership and true representation.

  • Mokey [none/use name]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    234 months ago

    Liberals actually care about shit when theres a republican in office so its not really beneficial if a dem is

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      174 months ago

      exactly, when trump was in, we heard about the atrocities on the news 24/7, then biden gets in and crickets