• BuelldozerA
    link
    English
    322 months ago

    I want a $10000 car that would normally be inflated to $30000 in the US.

    You can’t make that same car in the United States for anything like the same price. Even ignoring the Chinese Governments heavy subsidies there’s still a massive cost gap due to worker compensation, cost of compliance with safety regulations, cost of compliance with environmental regulations, and a whole host of other things.

    The cost of manufacturing in the United States is radically higher than it is in China and that simply isn’t fixable unless you’re going to unwind Union pay deals, remove environmental laws, and reduce safety restrictions.

    You cannot have both, so which are you choosing? Are you going to go with your wallet like a self absorbed capitalist or are you going to support union workers, stronger environmental laws, and more worker safety?

    • @karpintero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      252 months ago

      This is what I try to tell people who just want the cheapest things possible. We’re voting with our dollars what kind of world we want.

      Also, shipping things across the sea burns some of the worst fuel for the environment so I’d rather buy things made here and support the local economy whenever possible.

      • @exanime
        link
        English
        22 months ago

        This is what I try to tell people who just want the cheapest things possible. We’re voting with our dollars what kind of world we want.

        Ok, please tell me where can I buy <insert anything here> that’s wasn’t totally or partially made in China??

        I’m an avid learner and DIY, I try to only buy raw materials and tools to make everything I can myself … I have yet to see standard basic tools that were not made in China…

        I understand your point, but to expect that “voting with your wallet” will cause change, is like hoping we can turn around a cruise ship by blowing at it

        Just look at the enshitification of everything… Did people vote that in with their wallets? Or all services decided that on greed and left us no choice but to hold our noses or give up the last few vestiges of entertainment that we could still afford?

    • Veraxus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      so which are you choosing?

      I think most people will choose what they can actually afford. The fact that things cost so much and people aren’t being paid anywhere near enough to compensate for the skyrocketing price of consumer goods, including vehicles.

      Whatever the reasons, there is a very serious and dangerous disconnect between the prices of American goods and the spending power of the average American. Unless we do something about that - and I do not mean short-sighted, punitive, protectionist measures like tariffs - China is going to drink our milkshake.

      • @jaemo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -12 months ago

        Maybe the problem is our lifestyles. I’m unaware of any long term studies suggesting that in a situation in which the population increases and the resources and land are fixed, that it gets cheaper for anyone wanting anything.

          • @jaemo@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Nope. This just seems patently obvious to any but the dull-witted or anyone whose paycheck depends on denial of some fairly basic facts.

            (Edit: the downvotes only prove to me that “Idiocracy” was actually a documentary that fell backwards in time)

    • @JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Thatsthething.

      Everyone talks about how shitty the environment is and that we’re going to get burned alive in our lifetime…but at the same time, fuck the environment if it means cheap goods.

      Here’s some fun math. Burning a gallon of gas emits 8,887g of CO2. Let’s call it 8.9kg. 1000kgs in a tonne. That means 112 gallons emits a tonne of CO2.

      With me so far?

      It costs around $500 to remove a tonne of CO2 from the atmosphere.

      People act like $3/gal for gas is too much. I say, it’s nowhere near high enough. Gas has to cost $4.46/gal just to cover cleaning up the CO2 emitted from it. That’s just cleanup.

      Maybe if we had to pay the cost for our lifestyle, we’d readdress what we actually need. Instead, we have government subsidized global destruction. All of the EV/renewable tax rebates are great (as long as you can use them)…but it’s nothing compared to what oil gets.

      Don’t even get me started on beef.

    • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 months ago

      Mexico is just across the boarder, and US car makers already make their stuff there to save cash. Mexico has a pretty low unemployment rate right now, so pushing even more labor demand their way would help improve a lot of peoples’ lives by lifting salaries.

      But a lot of the cost is in battery manufacturing, not assembly. We need to experiment with sodium-ion batteries to bring those costs down for economy-class cars, just like China is. Maybe $10k is too little, but $15-20k should be feasible for a very basic car.

    • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 months ago

      You do understand they have to comply with our safety and environmental standards to sell here right?

    • @exanime
      link
      English
      12 months ago

      Sure we will take the sacrifice… I’m sure this time capitalist will get the message and start behaving reasonably

      It’s like that time thousands of us reduced or eliminated meat intake and suddenly the Kardashians realized taking private jet flight to avoid a few minutes of traffic was bad and stopped doing it

    • @bamboo@lemm.ee
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -12 months ago

      While I can’t say any of this is wrong, you’re missing likely the single biggest component inflating the cost of US manufacturing: profit margins. Every step of the supply chain has a profit margin attached. Sometimes just a few percent, but often double digits. These compound, so a 5% margin on a simple component will see an additional 15% when sold as part of an assembly, which is then marked up another 20% when sold as part of the finished good. There’s also financialization which burdens US companies. Companies generally need to take loans to fund their operations, and end up having to pay heavy interest fees and rent which also drives up cost. Workers and environmental protections are more expensive, but in practice they are relatively minor compared to a lot of other inefficiencies US industry struggles with.

      • BuelldozerA
        link
        English
        102 months ago

        Every step of the supply chain has a profit margin attached. Sometimes just a few percent, but often double digits.

        That’s true in China as well. The only difference is in the price of what is being marked up.