silence7@slrpnk.net to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agoThe Supreme Court effectively abolishes the right to mass protest in three US states | It is no longer safe to organize a protest in Louisiana, Mississippi, or Texas.www.vox.comexternal-linkmessage-square53fedilinkarrow-up1409arrow-down189cross-posted to: usa@lemmy.mlnews@hexbear.netpolitics@sh.itjust.works
arrow-up1320arrow-down1external-linkThe Supreme Court effectively abolishes the right to mass protest in three US states | It is no longer safe to organize a protest in Louisiana, Mississippi, or Texas.www.vox.comsilence7@slrpnk.net to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square53fedilinkcross-posted to: usa@lemmy.mlnews@hexbear.netpolitics@sh.itjust.works
minus-squareBuelldozerAlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·8 months ago I wonder if they aren’t touching it They aren’t touching it because they already DID with Counterman v. Colorado back in 2023. The issue is done and Sotomayor made this plain in her full remarks. This Vox article was carefully crafted to leave the reader ignorant and outraged.
minus-squareArmen12@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 months agoYes you repeated that line already and it doesn’t make any sense. The SCOTUS decision flat out says the opposite
minus-squareBuelldozerAlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 months ago The SCOTUS decision flat out says the opposite To summarize Justice Sotomayor in the decision “We decided this in 2023 and Mckesson shouldn’t be prosecuted. We’re not taking it up again.” I’m unclear how you can read Sotomayor and come away with anything other than that.
They aren’t touching it because they already DID with Counterman v. Colorado back in 2023. The issue is done and Sotomayor made this plain in her full remarks.
This Vox article was carefully crafted to leave the reader ignorant and outraged.
Yes you repeated that line already and it doesn’t make any sense. The SCOTUS decision flat out says the opposite
To summarize Justice Sotomayor in the decision “We decided this in 2023 and Mckesson shouldn’t be prosecuted. We’re not taking it up again.”
I’m unclear how you can read Sotomayor and come away with anything other than that.