@profwolff

Half of all renters in the US make major, long-lasting sacrifices to afford housing. A basic failing of US capitalism. Many millions suffer so a small minority - landlords - profit. The system is the problem.

Source: https://twitter.com/profwolff/status/1776718498519003278

  • TurtlePower
    link
    fedilink
    03 months ago

    Do you want shitty housing? Because that’s how you get shitty housing. The government doesn’t give a fuck about your comfort. They are as much a slum lord as Bob or Sandy or whoever owns the place you rent now. They will go with the lowest bidder, and do the bare minimum. The only benefit is the government pays SLIGHTLY more attention to safety standards (depending on your government).

    • macniel
      link
      fedilink
      113 months ago

      Well but when the Government provides Housing and it’s shitty throughout you can go and demonstrate for better quality of life which you can’t when the housing is owned by privates. They will just put on the street.

      • MxM111
        link
        fedilink
        -53 months ago

        And yet the housing will be still shitty compared with market driven solutions, such is UBI

        • @PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          33 months ago

          Homelessness is the market driven solution you dense as osmium apologist.

          Where’s that copy pasta that the only thing more depressing than the brutalist commieblock housing complexes is the homelessness they were built to prevent post WWII devastation?

          • MxM111
            link
            fedilink
            13 months ago

            It is one of the solutions. With UBI you should not have homeless (provided that you also have a mental care)

        • macniel
          link
          fedilink
          03 months ago

          Everything is better than late stage capitalism. And UBI is the only correct answer against the AI revolution.

    • @GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 months ago

      Shitty housing would still be a big leg up for the homeless and the near homeless. Lots of newly productive workers who aren’t worried about a roof. Win win

      • @pc36@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        -13 months ago

        Because having a house makes productive workers? I fail to see your logic here. A city I lived in did this. It didn’t produce workers, it produced income for contractors as the buildings were outright destroyed by the ‘tenants’. Needless to say the city didn’t stay in that business long, less than a year actually.

        If your goal is ‘workers’ while simultaneously bitching about capitalism…who do you plan on them to work for?

        • @GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          33 months ago

          The data is clear: the best way to reduce homelessness is to simply give people a safe, private address.