Schleswig-Holstein, Germany’s most northern state, is starting its switch from Microsoft Office to LibreOffice, and is planning to move from Windows to Linux on the 30,000 PCs it uses for local government functions.

Concerns over data security are also front and center in the Minister-President’s statement, especially data that may make its way to other countries. Back in 2021, when the transition plans were first being drawn up, the hardware requirements for Windows 11 were also mentioned as a reason to move away from Microsoft.

Saunders noted that “the reasons for switching to Linux and LibreOffice are different today. Back when LiMux started, it was mostly seen as a way to save money. Now the focus is far more on data protection, privacy and security. Consider that the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) recently found that the European Commission’s use of Microsoft 365 breaches data protection law for EU institutions and bodies.”

  • BuelldozerA
    link
    English
    3
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    If we want to see Linux compete with Windows for the desktop

    Linux could have the Desktop now. You could throw a lightly massaged Mint install down on nearly anyone’s desk and they’d be fine.

    However Linux is an Operating System, yeah yeah kernel I know, and vanishingly few people actually give a shit about the OS, what they care about is the application set and that’s where FOSS, not Linux, completely falls apart.

    Linux on the desktop for 30,000 Government PC’s? No problem. Removing Microsoft Office from those 30,000 Government PCs? Major problem!

    …small environments where the need for specialized apps is minimal…

    Nearly everyone uses MSO and even Google hasn’t been able to successfully work around this after plowing untold billions and a decade of effort into G-Suite…only to have it widely viewed as an inferior product. When you get to “specialized apps” territory it gets even worse since outside of STEM they’re almost all entirely written for Windows. You literally can’t get away because the software isn’t there to do it.

    …IT is a smaller group…

    Smaller group means that there’s less, or even NO, resources to find, maintain, and train people for “alternate” applications. It’s vastly less expensive to simply use the applications that users are already familiar with and that everyone else in their industry is using.

    …reduced cost realizations are more apparent and impactful…

    The “reduced cost realizations” only come from not buying licenses, which can be impactful, but that expense gets quickly overwhelmed by lost productivity, increased training cost, and higher support burden.

    Yes SOME organizations are able to make it work but those orgs are usually staffed with highly technical people and they’ve got leadership willing to bleed money while everything gets sorted out. Those two conditions don’t describe very many businesses and they are certainly not found in Governments.

    Linux the OS works just fine but that’s not the hurdle. The hurdle is the applications. To quote a famous sweaty guy on a stage one time this fight is about “Developers, Developers, Developers!”.