I think now is a great time to remind everyone, like sync’s developer, Lemmy’s developers need to be paid too! The amount of time all the devs put into making lemmy exist, in my opinion, should be worth some of your money. If you can afford it, donating to the people who develop lemmy and/or the people keeping your home instance up will accelerate the incredible growth of lemmy!

  • @1984
    link
    English
    6
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Why did NLnet sponsor the development for years, and now when Lemmy is successful, they stop sponsoring it?

    What was the goal of the sponsorship?

    The https://nlnet.nl/project/Lemmy/ link goes on about how the internet is preditory today and big tech exploits users, and then at the end:

    Lemmy is an open source tool that helps users discover what the fediverse has to offer as a decentralized alternative to for example Reddit. Everyone can host their own instance of Lemmy, determine their own moderation policy to keep discussion as civil as you would like and let users share, post, vote and interact without any corporate interference, all from the comfort of their server of choice. Search and discovery on the fediverse becomes easier, more fun and social, without forgoing independence and agency.

    Yeah ok, so why stop sponsoring the solution?

    • @morrowind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      NLnet paid them for every feature they launched, but with the explosive growth, they’ve been focusing on refactoring the codebase and making it more scalable, which doesn’t count as a “feature” I guess.

      • @1984
        link
        English
        71 year ago

        Reminds me of the corporate idea of software where new features are more important than quality.

        It’s like having a garden where you just spread new plants out and ignore the ones that don’t feel good where they are.

    • Leraje
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      NLnet offer grants so I would assume when they sponsor a project its for a fixed term, either in time or stage of development or amount of money.

      • @1984
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        Seems like throwing away money.

        I think users aren’t smart enough to donate to the Lemmy devs, not enough money at least.

        They will donate to apps and even instance owners, but not to the people who make the actual software we are all using.

        • Leraje
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 year ago

          NLnet aren’t crystal clear but I think they see their role as getting something up and running rather than continued funding, which is fair enough. Trying to support a multitude of projects indefinitely isn’t really feasible. At some point I feel it’s justified to ask users of the project (i.e. us) to support future work.

          • @1984
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            Lemmy needs at least 3 more years of funding… It just got off the ground here.

            I think if people don’t donate, this will turn into open source worked on by volunteers, which means a much slower pace.

            • Leraje
              link
              fedilink
              English
              31 year ago

              I absolutely agree, whilst I do monthly donate to .world, I donate more to Lemmy devs at the moment as it 's at a crucial stage of development and financial support is imperative right now. I just don’t think NLnet are set up to offer that sort of grant system.

              • @1984
                link
                English
                0
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Yeah I agree.

                I’m worried actually about this. Donations doesn’t really work most of the time, its not a fixed income and won’t provide stability for the devs. :/

                Imagine if this turns into some kind of open source where random people work on it sometimes. Will be buggy and slow development and lack direction. It may even stall completely.

                • Leraje
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  21 year ago

                  Well, I’m subbed on .world so it’s only fair I pay my way on this instance, irregardless of it’s size, the admins put in a lot of work after all. But, yeah, without the Lemmy devs, no instance has actual software to run so funding them has to be the priority, at least right now.

                  • @1984
                    link
                    English
                    11 year ago

                    The admin there are awesome, they are working all the time while under attack. But it’s bad for Lemmy to be so centralized. I think they should have closed registrations but they clearly have a desire to get all users there.

        • @Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          The problem is both the devs and instances need donations. Just saw a post one instances bills are $2300 a month. No on is going to pay that out of pocket.

          • @MBM@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            Oh boy, the last time I heard about finances (a month ago) it was all well below $100. Lemmy.ml only costed something like €10 a month.

          • @1984
            link
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yeah it’s better to keep instance size within your budget.

            But with so many users on Lemmy.world, donations could maybe work. Problem is that it’s not a fixed income, but the bills are fixed every month.