• Steve
          link
          English
          86 months ago

          For my own learning and understanding, why does it take that long for GNOME on Arch?

          • @GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            9
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Afaik they’re waiting for version xx.1 with bug fixes. Idk if GNOME is unstable in xx.0 and idk why it has such a special place on Arch but what I do know is that Plasma 6 is quite bad now with its 6.0.2 so I guess this delay is a good idea because I’m a GNOME user and I want stable experience

            • @aleph@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              66 months ago

              The added benefit in the delay on Arch is that most maintained extensions will have already been made compatible by the time it hits the repos.

            • @1984
              link
              3
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Don’t think it’s bad? It seems to have been a great release with Plasma 6. Don’t have any issues myself and haven’t seen anything major. But maybe I missed it.

              • @GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                26 months ago

                Idk about your hardware but on mine it’s not good. There were even full desktop crashes (the ones that make systemd boot log appear and only switching to a different session can make the system usable again). Btw I noticed issues on both Xorg and Wayland smh. Can’t remember them now though

                • @1984
                  link
                  26 months ago

                  Yeah it can vary of course. It works good on my machine. Amd graphics.

    • @pol5xc@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      36 months ago

      It’s already in extra-testing so I expect it to come soon, unless its dependency on util-linux-libs-2.40rc2, which is currently in core-testing, slows it down.