@floofloof@lemmy.ca to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 3 months agoExperimental Video Game Made Purely With AI Failed Because Tech Was 'Unable to Replace Talent'www.ign.comexternal-linkmessage-square112fedilinkarrow-up1485arrow-down123cross-posted to: games@hexbear.net
arrow-up1462arrow-down1external-linkExperimental Video Game Made Purely With AI Failed Because Tech Was 'Unable to Replace Talent'www.ign.com@floofloof@lemmy.ca to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 3 months agomessage-square112fedilinkcross-posted to: games@hexbear.net
minus-square@FiniteBanjolinkEnglish1•3 months agoIts intended use is to replace human work in exchange for lower accuracy. There is no ethical use case scenario.
minus-square@Lmaydev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglish1•3 months agoIt’s intended to show case its ability to generate text. How people use it is up to them. As I said it’s great for learning as it’s very accurate when summarising articles / docs. It even sources it so you can read up more if needed.
minus-square@FiniteBanjolinkEnglish0•3 months agoIt’s been known to claim commands and documentation exist when they don’t. It very commonly gets simple addition wrong.
minus-square@Lmaydev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglish1•3 months agoThat’s because it’s a language processor not a calculator. As I said you’re using it wrong.
minus-square@FiniteBanjolinkEnglish1•3 months agoSo the correct usage is to have documents incorrectly explained to you? I fail to see how that does any good.
Its intended use is to replace human work in exchange for lower accuracy. There is no ethical use case scenario.
It’s intended to show case its ability to generate text. How people use it is up to them.
As I said it’s great for learning as it’s very accurate when summarising articles / docs. It even sources it so you can read up more if needed.
It’s been known to claim commands and documentation exist when they don’t. It very commonly gets simple addition wrong.
That’s because it’s a language processor not a calculator. As I said you’re using it wrong.
So the correct usage is to have documents incorrectly explained to you? I fail to see how that does any good.
I know you do buddy.