• @FiniteBanjo
    link
    English
    23 months ago

    It’s the foundational principle of “Launch Windows.” Because the earth rotates the sun and also spins on an axis, we can launch at a time of day that gives us time to accelerate and then leave earth orbit in the direction of earth’s orbit around the sun with minimum amount of energy required. The majority of energy used is simply to escape Earth orbit. Once orbiting the sun, comparatively very little energy would be required to approach it utilizing it’s own gravity.

    During Perihelion the sun is 147100632 KM away, as the distance from the sun is not constant for earth’s orbit.

    • @Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      53 months ago

      It requires energy to shrink an orbit just as it does to grow it. Since we’re launching from Earth, we start with Earth’s orbit around the sun, and we have to burn enough to bring the perihelion of our launched child’s solar orbit to within the sun itself. We could use Venus or Mercury for gravity assists but the angular speed of the orbit does have to be mostly cancelled to hit the sun

      • @FiniteBanjo
        link
        English
        23 months ago

        It’s still a lot cheaper than instantaneously cancelling angular velocity.

          • @FiniteBanjo
            link
            English
            1
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Yes the source of thrust is still cheaper using a launch window. Basically, you don’t need to kick directly to the sun you just need the child to land somewhere below a maintainable orbit given their velocity. The closer they get the more gravity will effect them and do more work that we don’t have to do.