@callmepk@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml • 4 months agoDamn Linux Userslemmy.worldimagemessage-square143fedilinkarrow-up11.12Karrow-down139
arrow-up11.08Karrow-down1imageDamn Linux Userslemmy.world@callmepk@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml • 4 months agomessage-square143fedilink
minus-square@marcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink0•4 months agoWow, I can’t believe I’m reading that first point from a 2018 comment. I’d mock it if it was in 2006. You should have backups. Not hedge against 1 in 10 million error conditions. The second one is a huge bother in desktops. I never not regretted trying it. The third one is a complete non-problem.
minus-square@scratchandgame@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkTiếng Việt2•edit-24 months ago You should have backups. Not hedge against 1 in 10 million error conditions. if a partition isn’t actively written to, it’s less likely to suffer damage The second one is a huge bother in desktops. I never not regretted trying it. ok The third one is a complete non-problem. This is only a problem with OpenBSD. They never encourage using a huge single root partition, and never test it. It have an asterisk, not a -
Wow, I can’t believe I’m reading that first point from a 2018 comment. I’d mock it if it was in 2006.
You should have backups. Not hedge against 1 in 10 million error conditions.
The second one is a huge bother in desktops. I never not regretted trying it.
The third one is a complete non-problem.
ok
This is only a problem with OpenBSD. They never encourage using a huge single root partition, and never test it.
It have an asterisk, not a -