@YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish • 11 months ago‘I can’t believe we’re having this conversation’: the states pushing for 14-year-olds to serve alcoholwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square181fedilinkarrow-up11Karrow-down10cross-posted to: antinatalism@lemmy.world
arrow-up11Karrow-down1external-link‘I can’t believe we’re having this conversation’: the states pushing for 14-year-olds to serve alcoholwww.theguardian.com@YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish • 11 months agomessage-square181fedilinkcross-posted to: antinatalism@lemmy.world
minus-squarejusthachlinkfedilink12•11 months agoCan I not be upset at both? Not sure how what I said seemed like an approval of 14yo working in bars, but go off.
minus-square@LethalSmack@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink5•11 months agoIt’s cause the drinking age is such a benign issue compared to child labor. It’s serves as a distraction from the main issue at hand.
minus-square@fidodo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink2•11 months agoI don’t think you worded it well then. You said “get a reasonable drinking age first”. The first there implies that it’s ok to have children working in bars as long as it comes after lowering the drinking age.
minus-square@Chee_Koala@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•11 months agoIs doesn’t imply that for me at all, which indicates it might be a case of translation noise.
Can I not be upset at both? Not sure how what I said seemed like an approval of 14yo working in bars, but go off.
It’s cause the drinking age is such a benign issue compared to child labor.
It’s serves as a distraction from the main issue at hand.
I don’t think you worded it well then. You said “get a reasonable drinking age first”. The first there implies that it’s ok to have children working in bars as long as it comes after lowering the drinking age.
Is doesn’t imply that for me at all, which indicates it might be a case of translation noise.